Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Marks63Catalina

Pages: [1]
1
Good news then Spud. Thanks for your help. Sounds like unless I have a mechanical problem with the pump it should all be good. Thanks again for your help. 
Mark L

2
Thank you for your thoughts and expertise. It is much appreciated. I never expect to do any kind of long term high fuel flow need runs, other than the usual 1/4 or 1/8th mile runs. That's why I felt the 3.5 gallon front surge tank would be adequate for my needs. My pump is a PG-150A. There's 1-4689 stamped on the pump so I assume it's a -1 pump. It was used on an early top fuel dragster so it probably flows a lot of fuel. If this all works and I can use the pump, would it be a good idea to send it into Hilborn maybe every or every other year for inspection and rebuild? Can it be rebuilt? I had a little brain storm (brain fart??). With the cable operated bypass at the exit of the pump, I could  incorporate a linkage/cable attachment to the carb linkage and it could open and close the bypass along with the throttle position. That would take stress off the pump, the regulator, and that bypass could go back to the pump inlet? Just trying to figure out the best way to make this thing work. It looks great on the front of the motor, and it would save me buying a big expensive electric  pump for the rear of the car. Plus I know I would never run out of fuel because of the pump. Call me whacky!! Thank you again for your time and help.  Mark L

3
I had a real good laugh when I first saw Glenns car with the front end sticking thru the wall. But ya gots ta do what ya gots ta do right? I had a nice 30 by 40 shop back in WI before I retired. Now I'm back down to a tight two car garage again. But making do with what I have. Plus if I tried to do what Glenn did, I don't think my wife would go for tripping over the front wheels everytime she went to the fridge, LOL.  Mark L

4
Your Builds / Photo Gallery / Re: Wallace Racing Dragster
« on: February 07, 2013, 03:25:27 PM »
John. I've been watching all the banter over on the PY boards. I've not seen the car before though. Good to see you here. Mark L

5
Altereds / Re: Altereds from the past
« on: February 07, 2013, 03:22:15 PM »
That pic of the interior of the Screamer altered is fantastic. Couple of things stand out. The push button trans (chrysler torqueflite) console for the trans must have been crazy in a car like that. Just finding, gripping, and shifting a stick must be hard enough in an altered, but to find and push a button with that kind of acceleration and the antics that the altereds did. I can't magine it. But that doesn't mean it ain't cool. The other thing is the suicide door/doors. Just to have doors is different, can you imagine having some body flex during a run and having the door come open. It definitely makes that pic about an early car. Those pics are great. We have a guy around here (Glendale AZ area) that built a fiat Topalino altered street machine. I have to get a pic of it when I see it. Tunnel rammed small block Chevy, solid mounted body with ingress and egress  thru the open roof. It is a really good close copy of an altered. Makes me want to build one too. More pics Dutchman, more pics. LOL. Oh yeah. One of the most famous altered pics of the Chanook. Just a classic.   Mark L   

6
I want to get your opinion on this combination. First, the reason for such an unusual combination. I was given this Hilborn pump off of an early top fuel dragster with instructions to find a way to use it if I could. It was originally on the late Johnny Lopers (Lopers Phoenix Speed Shop owner) top fuel dragster back in the '60's and early '70's. It was given to a friend who worked closely with Johnny at his shop. The friend wants me to find a way to use it instead of it sitting on a shelf collecting dust. With that said. I want to try to use it on the car I am building. It's a street/strip Gasser type street freak. 1960 Pontiac block .090 over. All new forged bottom end. Forged Ross dished pistons, aluminum GRP rods, splayed 4 bolt center caps, steel rod inserts from the center decks down into the waterjacket bottom for deck support, etc etc. So it is a well planned/serious short block for the task, not a throw together set up. I will be running twin 76MM turbos, twin air to water intercoolers, twin 750 blow thru CSU carbs on a Wenzler Tunnel Ram. All this is set up for pump E-85. I am shooting for a normally lower 1000 HP with intent to raise the boost under controlled situations for 1500 or more HP. I need a good fuel system. So this is my plan. Feel free to guide, critique, and or  shoot me in the head if you feel that it's just not doable. If I cannot use it as a pump I have an alternative plan too.

This is the "NOT" set in stone plan starting from the back of the car. I have 26 gal alum fuel tank from a boat (I have). I'll add a simple low pressure electric pump only to feed a front mounted Moon 3.5 gal surge tank ( I have). This Moon tank already has a provision welded on for a Holley fuel bowl. I also hope to install the tank close to and above the pump inlet to aid fuel flow. The pump is already mounted on the engine with a Moon front timing cover, cam driven using a custom made adaptor to use a BBC drive spud. The surge tank will be plumbed with AN -12 line to the pump. The pump is equiped with a shutoff/bypass valve on the outlet side, using AN -8 line/fittings. I plan to run the outlet side to an Aeromotive bypass 4 port regualtor set at 6-7 pounds, AN-6 lines to each fuel bowl. The bypass is to return to the surge tank thru a small air to air finned cooler if needed (to fight any fuel heating from the pumping and returning).
I know the pump will provide plenty of flow for my needs. The regulator should handle the flow to the carb bowls, and bypass the rest. The outlet -8 sized line is what they used on it for the fueler so I feel that should be fine. My questions are:
1. Am I nuts???? (Likely, yes).
2. If it is doable. Are my plans OK or do they need major revamping?
3. I wonder if the bypass from the regulator is better returned to the surge tank or to the inlet of the pump?
4. Do you think a carb based fuel regulator will be able to handle the higher RPM pressure profile of the pump to bypass and not flood the carbs?
5. Do you know if the pressure profile is such that it will not unduly stress the pump under idle and or cruise conditions? Meaning, if the pump profile, at say 3000 rpm cruise, is already making high pressure, will that hurt the pump for longer run times such as a drive thru the city. Or a steady state freeway/highway run of 30 to 60 minutes without a stop?  I'm trying to determine if the pump will handle this kind of environment. Since they're really designed for short high pressure runs. I mentioned the original bypass valve after the pump outlet because I could see during a cruise where I could actually run a manual cable to the bypass and open it for a bypass back to the rear tank to lessen the pressure and stress during a long cruise, plus that fuel being pumped and heated could return to the rear tank instead of the surge tank. Keeping the surge tank cooler.
I mentioned an alternative. If the pump just is not a good candidate for this kind of use, then I thought mounting the pump without the cam drive attachment. Then run a strong electric (Aeromotive A1000) pump under the surge tank, but plumb it thru the Hilborn pump with pump, fins removed to allow flo thru. The rest after the pump would follow thru.

Well I hope I didn't leave anything out. Sorry for the long (possibly boring, lol) description. Everything hinges on the pumps ability to work within these confinments/requirements. Plus it's longevity as a viable pump for many more miles than it was originally designed for. I have seen others using it for the street but they always had it on a real Mechanical Fuel Injecton (non forced induction or carbed) system set up almost exactly as designed. I also don't know what kind of miles their pumps sees.
Thank you Spud for your time and expertise on this matter.  It is much appreciated.

Mark L               

7
Altereds / Re: Altereds from the past
« on: February 05, 2013, 09:45:34 AM »
Dutchman, I'm new to this site and far from a policy maker, but I can't imagine anyone not liking those pics. They are fanatastic. I have one observation on some pics. Your very first pic is of the Mother-in-Law altered. If you look at the header outlets, three of the four on that side have something in the pipe header, resembling baffels, but I'm sure not a baffle. In an action shot of the same car several pics later, they are not there. I wonder if they were some form of header closer/plug to prevent dirt or prevent the valve from cooling too fast?? I hope some one knows what they are. Keep the pics coming. They are great for studing the parts and combinations that were running back then.
Mark L 

8
Your Builds / Photo Gallery / Re: New member from Glendale AZ
« on: February 05, 2013, 08:32:51 AM »
Glenn thanks for the welcome. When I saw your post that this site was starting up. I had to be a part of it. Nothing neater than the old front engine or any nostalgic drag cars. The best part of the old days was the fantastic diversity of engines, transmissions, parts collections and swaping. Nothing was standardized so many ran either what they liked or just had on hand.  All those years pared down the designs/types to just a few, and that's great for and works for the modern times. But the old days were special. I really wish you well on the future of th esite. I think it will be a hugh smash.
I did see that you had a Gasser section so I do have a home to participate in. Although my Pontiac is not exactly tradional, I can still enjoy the cars and people involved with these cars.
Denver, you think ya's gots me?? HUH?? HA! I've got a Pontiac 4 sitting in my shed. If I ever get done with my present project I really want to build a Pontiac 4. There's a guy in NY that has built a turbocharged 4 and put it in his '64 Lemans convert. He took a Torker intake and modified it but he is having some fuel distibution problems. So he is perfecting his combination right now. But even though he is having fuel problems, he has topped over 600 HP with it. I can see over 700 when he gets it figured out.
I do remember seeing pics of that little dragster running the Pontiac 4 with the adapted 409 valve cover. I have no idea why he did that but it sure makes it unique and different. Canadian Pontiacs used Chevy motors in the '60's. They used 409s for their special high performance Catalinas and Bonnevilles etc. My guess is the builder is Canadian and wanted to use the 409 valve cover because his experiences were with the 409 in Pontiacs, wanted to keep that connection???  OR, he just wanted to be different. Which I applaud.
Glenn, I still love your dragster and I keep popping in at PY to see how you're doing. Massive project but you're doing great on and the blower is going to be one heck of a nice set up. Can't wait to see it running again.  Again thanks for the welcome and I plan to enjoy the site. 

Mark L

9
Your Builds / Photo Gallery / New member from Glendale AZ
« on: February 04, 2013, 09:54:45 PM »
Hello to all. I'm know Glenn from a couple of Pontiac forums and saw his invite to join. I do not have and probably will never have a chance to build or own a front engine drag car. I am currently building a street/strip '63 Pontiac Catalina Street Freak/Gasser with twin turbos on a '60 Pontiac 389 block. But I'm here mainly to pick up on any tech and ideas that I might be able to apply to my car. I'm also a big fan of the  nostalgic dragsters and alter setc. So I plan to get a lot of enjoyment from other peoples projects and triumphs. Thank you for allowing me to join your group. Mark L

Pages: [1]